If we try to difine the most credible humanism so strictly, only never having the idea must have the most credible idea, that answer probably will be left to us as the best answer. 

What makes us conclude so is probably derived from the truth that any ethnicity, typed individual must have each own justice, creed or any value, as in frank, on the earth, we have no united and totally seen correct at least "the true and credible absolutely correct idea", because in any ethnicity abiding unit, each own subjectively regarded own the sole correctness in mind to each other must be made naturally and necessarily. 

Consequently, to us, only, on the earth, no any absolutely seen correct truth must be present, thinking so must be the most appropriately valid idea, that answer must be outputted.

And, probably any message can be partially universal to anybody, and even one so splendid message can be only partially effective to send or to be given. Thus, no matter what one very wonderful message can be effective partially to anybody and the each distinctively shared mind can accept partially wonderful value or sense. 

In other words, in circle for us, each very own sense can be made, installed and shared, though after all, no perfectly universal message can be present, the idea must be the sole relatively more natural idea to anybody, probably. 

And, in frank, those ideas are never in frank conservative, but rather very simply natural idea. Though, necessarily even the concept of humanism can provide us some unidentified mistificable impression as well.

(Irregularly continued)

Apr. 17th.   2024

Very shortened Spring like naturally in Spring, very shortened autumn like that, only Hotter Summer and Colder Winter in turn, earlier morning coldness and daytime hot temperature, population swollen phenomenal global totaled transition, the Sun by itself in swelling more and more, all those are awkwardly overwrapped own horrific universal conditioned change. 

Harshly visible contrast in our own being, but the being only in our brain fantasy won't be embodied so really in our own survival environment.

Very extremely visible temperature gap between daytime and nighttime will be accelerated moreover in our own future.

To some very convincing allegorical extent, we will be obliged to survive very harshly despaired reality so for long period, making any maximally negative future apperance picturing in our brain, as the neighborhood, to us, heavy contrast in coldness and hotness, with emotionally positively regarded future prospect abiding positive imagination and on the contrary extremely negative one in extreme contrast. 

Schizo paranoiac and Phreniac heavily contrast given own reality will be to us what we should keep company with each other between them and us.

Nature phenomenal vicious circle could be one of Lord's own mischievous circumlocution.

But we should never fall into cheeper substantialism so carefully, you know. Nevertheless, we gradually will be accstuomed with those so strange phenomenal realities, you know. That own lazy inertia by itself could be never so exceptional given thing to us, thus it's rather very constantly given our own not that welcoming own phenomena, you see.

(Irregularly continued)

Apr. 17th.    2024

E.g. in general, Bergson can be regarded as idealist, or spiritualist and Husserl can be done as Phenomenologist, but in fact, to the two ones's own mind, each narrated thing which can be pictured is not that easily confirmed nor identified.

In other words, we have no method to confirm our own immanent minds' own perfect mutual match or not in definite discerning. Though, in general to us, meaning is in general very arbitrarily set and mutually grasped, but truly shared mind in accord won't be evidenced. 

Thereby our mutual understanding and accord must be so arbitrary. In other words, at superficially appearing notional accord mutually we can make in daily life and mutually truly the identical understanding embodied or not in discrimination are never so indispensably acquired condition to us, intrinsically indeed. 

Thereby, anything made by us in our own community is simply arbitrary, no other definitive cognition must never be set to our own reality. Focussing meaning presicely strictly as it focused, that desire is one of our mind's easily falling contradiction, you know.

After all, no matter what we think and feel in mind, only what we express externally could be regarded formally what we think and feel, only the thing is regarded as the truth, only it gets the absolute regulation to us. And only the thing is the absolute our social regulation.

Though, if we human being could be creature whose brain seen from anybody and it makes anybody know the brain owner's idea, we must have not owned language communication in civilization of us. 

(Irregularly continued)

Apr. 17th.   2024